Rankings/Dogs/Hill's Science Plan

Hill's Science Plan

Medium Adult Optimal Care

Dogs · kibble · 12 kg

B

Overall score72/100· Good

Summary

Decent kibble. Chicken as 1st ingredient but cereals in 2nd and 3rd position. No problematic additives. AAFCO validated formula.

Sub-scores

BProteins
BNutrition balance
AUndesirables
CTransparency
ASpecies adaptability

Composition analysed

Dehydrated chicken (20%), corn, wheat, chicken fat, rice, beet pulp, flaxseed oil, vitamin E, L-carnitine, taurine

  1. ADehydrated chicken20%protein
  2. CCorncereal
  3. CWheatcereal
  4. AChicken fatfat
  5. BRicecereal
  6. BBeet pulpfiber
  7. AFlaxseed oilfat
  8. AVitamin Evitamin mineral
  9. AL-carnitinebeneficial additive
  10. ATaurinebeneficial additive

Nutritional analysis

Crude protein
25%
Crude fat
15%
Ash
6.5%
Fibre
2%
Moisture
8%

Strengths

  • First ingredient is a named animal protein
  • No undesirable additives detected
  • Balanced nutritional profile
  • Well suited to the species' needs

Weaknesses

    Similar alternatives

    PetFoodRate editorial review

    Hill's Science Plan Medium Adult is the mainstream vet-recommended kibble that sits one tier above Royal Canin in our grading. At 72/100 (B grade), it gets the basics right: chicken as the first ingredient (not rice), no BHA/BHT, AAFCO validated formulation. The weak points are familiar to anyone who reads labels: corn and wheat in positions 2 and 3, limited transparency on fat sources, and a modest 25 percent protein level for a carnivore. Hill's invests heavily in clinical feeding trials (they publish more peer-reviewed studies than any other pet food brand), which gives their formulations a scientific credibility that composition alone does not. If your vet recommends Hill's over Royal Canin, they are making the better call. If your budget allows Acana or Wellness CORE, you are making a better one.

    Compared to the competition

    BHill's Science PlanvsCRoyal Canin Adult Medium

    Hill's scores 14 points higher than Royal Canin (72 vs 58). Chicken first vs rice first. Better transparency. Same price range.

    BHill's Science PlanvsAAcana Wild Prairie Recipe

    Acana scores 90/100 (A) vs Hill's 72/100 (B). The gap is the protein source: Acana uses 75% animal protein from 3+ named species vs Hill's 25% from one. Acana costs roughly 60% more.

    Frequently asked questions

    Hill's vs Royal Canin: which is better?

    Hill's scores B (72/100) vs Royal Canin's C (58/100). Hill's has chicken first, Royal Canin has rice first. Hill's publishes more clinical data. For the same price bracket, Hill's is the objectively better mainstream choice.

    STORIES · BRAND

    See the brand on video

    User reviews

    Loading reviews...

    Leave a review for this product

    Your review will be verified before publication. No personal data is shared.

    Frequently asked questions

    What score does Hill's Science Plan Medium Adult Optimal Care get?

    Hill's Science Plan Medium Adult Optimal Care gets a grade of B (72/100), i.e. "good", on the PetFoodRate A to E scale. The grade combines five axes: protein quality, nutritional balance, absence of undesirable ingredients, labelling transparency and species suitability.

    What are the strengths and weaknesses of Hill's Science Plan Medium Adult Optimal Care?

    Strengths: First ingredient is a named animal protein, No undesirable additives detected, Balanced nutritional profile, Well suited to the species' needs.

    Is Hill's Science Plan Medium Adult Optimal Care a good fit for dogs?

    On species suitability, this product scores A. It is broadly suited to the needs of dogs, as part of a balanced diet.

    How does PetFoodRate rate dry food?

    PetFoodRate grades every product from A to E independently and deterministically, from the ingredient list and analytical constituents, with no sponsored brands and no influence from affiliate links.